Balance Thread

Tamdrik Wrote:I think it's warranted in this situation, since we have an entire new expansion to balance, and we simply might not get to certain cards otherwise.

Yeah, I can understand your reasoning and thats why I'm not making an arguement for "OMG STOPZ!" I just wanted to pointed out for future reference, if people try to drag this over to the real balance fourm.

Tamdrik Wrote:Right, I just meant you can get one Nano out and make a Radd-lifer basically invulnerable.

You can do the exact same thing for one less mana with Diane.

Tamdrik Wrote:And before you say "more than 4", just remember that if you have multiple Nanos out, they can each apply their life boost. Not that I imagine most people would bother with a field of Nanos.

Re:Modulo
[quote=Tamdrik]I do like the suggestion to make his ability A-speed to respond to effect-D, though.

Yeah, I like that as well.

Tamdrik Wrote:Leave it misspelled? Why?

Good grammar is evil.

masamunemaniac Wrote:Wait, we're trying to balance the 1/1 monsters against the 1/1 monsters that haven't been balanced yet? That makes no sense.

I mean, really, the likes of Crystal Atomaton are like some crazy uber Tanuki, with stats worthy of a 1.5 mana monster, but 100% generation. Seriously, a 1/1 monster should be halfway between a 1 mana monster (upper end, like Boomboxen, Diane or Tanuki) and a 2 mana monster.

I don't know about anyone else, but I'm balancing against that because I think it's balanced. There's no reason to have any more rediculously bad weenies. I'd say balancing against the existing 1 mana creatures makes less sense, as nearly everyone agree's that they're too weak.