1mana monsters

Kelar Citizen: I'd rather pay for +3/+3 than bet on a 50% chance to gain +1/+1. I wonder about free "target elf gets +2/+2".
I know we keep throwing these out there but would "Draw Phase: If Elven City Kel'sor is in play, 50% chance draw a card" be acceptable?
If the Citizens could generate 1.5 with Kel'sor, I would of accepted the first proposal for Kelar Citizen.

Skyrian:

azulknight Wrote:Second: Chronology. It was mentioned in the beginning and then seemed to fall to the wayside. As I see it:
...
Skyrian Soldier: Facedown didn't exist till Holiday Present.

Ultros Wrote:I hadn't considered it before, since it wasn't touched upon beyond the first post or so, but I think you're right about chronology. I say that keywords are all we should make fit, since it's not really that obvious at a glance that certain additions to the code (such as abilities targetting creatures or players, or cards checking to see if they were damaged) were introduced in certain sets. The introduction of keywords, however, is set-defining, and I agree that these should be preserved.

This is how the idea for Skyrian was "rejected". It seems to be bad ju-ju to have older cards with newer abilities.

Melrak Follower: Would rather wait for the stat balancing part before giving actual values to +att/+ or -life, but accept.
Lokar Guard: Accpet.