Milo Wrote:alphamai1300 Wrote:3.13158 does not do it justice. Any comic with which references and parodies FF (namely, any) must be at least five pythons. Only way for the comic to register lower on a funny scale is if it were actually serious.
But even if they're not funny, serious comics can be devastatingly useful in certain kinds of decks.  This is not to be ignored in their value.
Actually, what Ultros said, using one absolute scale like the Python scale is not enough. My referenced comic, though not funny at all, is very potent. I was
not saying that it meant that the comic was not any good. Like any system, each comic can be rated in various ways, and then have an overal rating. They Python system is just an aspect. If I were to give an overall rating, the referenced comic would be much higher than what I gave it under the Python system.
#615: Since webrunner left it open to interpretation, it allows for repeated views and new concepts to be brought in. If we as the fan community could agree on a
singular view, this would allow for an expected result from anyone, new or old, to view it and force one interpretation. That is my suggestion.
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help
