Takato_Guil Wrote:But since I've proven using several real world experiments that rock does indeed beat paper (AND scissors), the logic ISN'T flawed.
Actually, Rock, Paper, Scissors is a not very good analogy to use. It all really depends on what the Rock, Paper and Scissors are. Now, the Rock could be a burning, planet-sized that would burn/melt or totally destroy everything in its path. Now the Scissors could be created out of super-high-tech-fusion slicers that could cut anything into shreds. Now the paper could be a perfect 2-D plane that can sperate any object, liquid or gas to the atomic level.
Now a better analogy would be: Ordinary camp Fire, a tree and a rainstorm. Since the campfire burns down the tree, and the tree can absorb the water from the rain, then that means
fire>tree>rain
Not that the above was actually important.
But Shadey>Karn in 1 on 1.
Karn+Party vs Shadey is still unknown because we dont know what party Karn would use. Someone could go 1 by 1 with each possible party formation, but that would take a very long time.