warpwell, well, well

yeah it can be

but its flavorful that that has to hurt creatures to get the great mana gen

I don't see Warpwell as a soul stealing device, but I agree that it should be an even 1/1 if the cost is decreased.

Mmm. Yes. Reduce light and dark each one. Leave sac. Would put a bit more umph in there indeed.
Its REALLY needs to also hide its own generation. Bad. But this is... a more complex issue.

Hydrogen cell has become PLAYIBLE thanks to that one mana off the top of each. It seemed awfully painfull before. Admitely, its 3 powers a punch-but few things need it. Prehaps a rebalance one day when we have a dozen more things relying on more than 1 or 2 power. But for now...

If the cost is reduced, it will also need a sac reduction.

Tally:

Reduce cost: Ezekel(-1/-1), masamunemaniac(-1), Nacho(-1/-1), �ルノ(-1), RogueThunderBird(-1/-1)
Total: 5
Reduce cost/sac: bubbleman2(-1/-1 & -1), sXeAndriex(-1/-1 & -1), Vincent(-1/-1 & -1)
Total: 3
Fine as is: Serith(fine with cost/sac reduction), NOLDER(fine with cost/sac reduction)
Total: 2

Given that the two who think the card is fine as is are okay with a cost change, very strong support for it. Then we run into the problem of what parts to change. There's 3 who just want the cost reduced, 3 who want that along with a sac reduction (5 if you count Serith and NOLDER), and 2 who want to reduce only 1 of the costs but never specified which one (or provided a reason for reducing only one or the other). By technicality, -1/-1 & -1 is currently the majority opinion. It also is a lesser boost than just -1/-1 for the two who wanted only one cost to be reduced.

I think it's closer to balanced than Hydrogen Cell as it is, but -1/-1 and a cost drop would keep it up with current conditions.

And now it's 11 cheaper and has 1 less sac.