King, Regent, and Khari

ChaosEX Wrote:The problem is that it would make it so that people would play Valiron to sac it next turn, and possibly play another one just as easy. and 45 points spread between three can be more valuable than 60 all to one.

Yes but in order to do that you need: One, have to have many copies of a high cost unique monster which is nothing but a dead weight for the first few turns. Two, a few decent paladins which aren't cheap themselves (3+ mana each). So for a minimum total of 19 mana you can give 45 attack between 3 paladins.

I'm just don't think people will put 3-5 copies of Valiron, who is one of the best paladins, in a single deck just to sac him for 15 attack to each of your paladins. I can see him being used to attack a few times and then being sacced but I still don't think that will end up being the main combo of the deck.



Edit: I would like to see Regent's ability give +0/3 to all dark elves

Regent Faritin: 55/55
King Valiron: +15/-15
Khari: Already great. Fine as is.

Simply put, Valiron was meant to damage paladins while giving them a boost. Unless there's a reason the card can not be balanced while retaining it's original intent, it seems to me that it should remain.

Khari: Fine as is.
King: +20/-10
Regent: 60/60
Hoover: Make it unique

Sorry about the lack of explanation. I have around 15 more balance threads to cover...